We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has high support capability."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →
"Okta controls all the users. It has context-based access from the user and type of device. It identifies the risk and can do a step of authentication when that user is trying to access some sensitive application from an unknown device."
"Enabled MFA to access federated applications as well as increased user satisfaction through improved provisioning times and more reliable processes."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"The product is easy to use."
"The initial setup of Okta Workforce Identity is straightforward. I was able to get an environment ready within half a day."
"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →
"The only aspect in which it can be improved is that the interface could be cleaner. I found this even when I was trying to do my certification exam because the certification is hands-on. You find yourself fumbling around a little bit to find simple things. This happens even when you start to get familiar with the product."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"It only facilitates provisioning and not de-provisioning."
"SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 27th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 58 reviews. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Okta Workforce Identity vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Authentication Systems vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
