We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"Its most valuable features are usability and integration with other IBM products."
"We have used a lot of out-of-the-box reporting on the process performance metrics. We have been able to make suggested changes to staff for this role or streamlining by eliminate some activities where people were not requiring a lot of work in the first place."
"It is a stale solution."
"The performance is fine."
"The functionality to design UI to be responsive and can run on multiple devices."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"It is a very powerful solution."
"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."
"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization."
"Simulation is most valuable."
"The solution is very stable."
"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it."
"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"I would like to see a lot more case studies."
"I hope IBM uses something from IBM Content Navigator to make the interface easier to navigate."
"I would like to see more inclusion of RPA technologies. If we have more manual processes, we can use robotic process automation and integrate that in with the solution."
"The stability varies because it involves a lot of other components like databases, so sometimes if something goes wrong there, it can't recover from the fatal errors."
"IBM BPM's UI is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Needs better reporting. I do not think that we are fully taking advantage of what it already has yet."
"The constant switch between Eclipse and its web versions can be annoying and confusing."
"With iGrafx, the implementation and the licensing were pretty complex."
"The price could be more competitive."
"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."
"I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."
"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."
"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."
"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."
"It can be more user-friendly."
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 20th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 15 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda and ADONIS. See our IBM BPM vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.