We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Microsoft, Wazuh and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)."The log analysis is excellent; it can predict what can or will happen regarding use patterns and vulnerabilities."
"The scalability is great. You can put unlimited logs in, as long as you can pay for it. There are commitment tiers, up to six terabytes per day, which is nowhere close to what any one of our customers is running."
"The data connectors that Microsoft Sentinel provides are easy to integrate when we work with a Microsoft agent."
"The analytics has a lot of advantages because there are 300 default use cases for rules and we can modify them per our environment. We can create other rules as well. Analytics is a useful feature."
"Sentinel has features that have helped improve our security poster. It helped us in going ahead and identifying the gaps via analysis and focusing on the key elements."
"Another area where it is helping us is in creating a single dashboard for our environment. We can collect all the logs into a log analytics workset and run queries on top of it. We get all the results in the dashboard. Even a layman can understand this stuff. The way Microsoft presents it is really incredible."
"Microsoft Sentinel comes preloaded with templates for teaching and analytics rules."
"The AI and ML of Azure Sentinel are valuable. We can use machine learning models at the tenant level and within Office 365 and Microsoft stack. We don't need to depend upon any other connectors. It automatically provisions the native Microsoft products."
"It's built around Red Hat Linux, which is highly robust."
"Integration is very easy and the reporting is good."
"What I like about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is that it uses machine learning algorithms to generate risk scoring for the user activity. I also like that it syncs with our Active Directory users, so it really has full coverage for all users in our environment."
"The most valuable features of IBM Security QRadar are flexibility, IBM support, and scalability."
"Flexible and valuable product that is modular, so you can easily set up a roadmap for your clients."
"The solution can scale."
"Improved our organization's TCO."
"We've found the solution to be scalable."
"The security level that they are maintaining with the pre-authentication keys is very good."
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Pros →
"We'd like to see more connectors."
"The KQL query does not function effectively with Windows 11 machines, and in the majority of machine-based investigations, KQL queries are essential for organizing the data during investigations."
"The only thing is sometimes you can have a false positive."
"Currently, the watchlist feature is being utilized, and although there have been improvements, it is still not fully optimized."
"I think the number one area of improvement for Sentinel would be the cost."
"The reporting could be more structured."
"Given that I am in the small business space, I wish they would make it easier to operate Sentinel without being a Sentinel expert. Examples of things that could be easier are creating alerts and automations from scratch and designing workbooks."
"We'd like also a better ticketing system, which is older."
"If you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. You need to have more storage."
"Maybe there should be more custom rules in the exchange. Basically, we are using a lot of threat rules, so maybe they'll develop something like that."
"The biggest problem was built on top of the QRadar in the executive operations center network. The integration was not using the network security specialist properly, and all the incidents were inferior with QRadar. Its compatibility is not really good."
"There could be improvements made to the UI, the user interface. Though the newer version, 7.3.2, might already have this improvement in place."
"While the interface is easy to use, it could be a little more responsive."
"Some of the cloud apps need improvement."
"The threat intelligence functionality can be better. In addition, it can have more monitoring capabilities."
"Ideally we would like a mobile version so that any alert that comes in will notify us in a mobile app, or by using SMS integration."
"The solution could improve by providing better documentation for beginners to learn, such as videos or other tutorials."
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Cons →
More Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews while Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is ranked 43rd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service writes " Easy to install, highly secure standards, and reliable". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM, Elastic Security and Sentinel, whereas Oracle Security Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Service is most compared with AWS Security Hub, LogRhythm SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Rapid7 InsightVM.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors and best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.