We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle SOA Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Windows Server IIS is stable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."
"IIS is easy to configure in terms of websites and other solutions."
"The interface, simplicity, and ease of management are all good features that make this user-friendly."
"IIS's best features are its management console and stability."
"The most valuable feature of the facility, as the partner link, is to try to use third-party services and logic in your own vehicle to orchestrate the information."
"This is one of the critical products for my company and we use it extensively. We currently use each and every feature of Oracle SOA."
"Conceptually, how it integrates a lot of essential enterprise process components. That's the most valuable."
"It performs better in real-time transactions."
"The stability of the solution is the most valuable feature."
"The product provides transparency in finances."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle SOA Suite is all the platform's capabilities."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"In the next release, the tool should be more easily integrated and configured with other provisions. The pricing should also be made cheaper since it's very expensive now."
"I would like to see NLB features in IIS."
"Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look."
"We'd like future versions to be more stable."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"Compared to Linux, the solution’s Windows patching is slower. I would like to improve it."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are monitoring, debugging, and troubleshooting."
"The level of technical support the solution offers could be improved."
"It's also not developer-friendly."
"Various parts of SOA, BPEL, and so on, each have their own consoles which need to be accessed individually with different logins. It would be better from an admin perspective if all the consoles were accessible via a single login."
"Another area of improvement is performance. Because with multiple solutions connecting to the SOA platform, the performance of the SOA platform can be affected in time. So, that could be one area that could be improved with the SOA."
"The solutions can improve the communication or translations between formats, such as JSON and XML. The JSON REST API could improve."
"The web services need to be more robust."
"The interface is too complicated. Making modifications still requires too much technical knowledge."
"An area for improvement in Oracle SOA Suite is the cost. It could be lower."
"I would like to see divided containers more separately as a microservice."
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while Oracle SOA Suite is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 65 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle SOA Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle SOA Suite writes "Easy to setup, provides good support and scalable solution ". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and JBoss, whereas Oracle SOA Suite is most compared with Mule ESB, WebLogic Suite, Apache Web Server, TIBCO ActiveMatrix and IBM BPM. See our IIS vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
