We performed a comparison between Imprivata OneSign and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are MFA, and SSO, which have high security."
"It has a wide range of MFA options. I prefer "Okta Verify" out of them all."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"Okta integrates well with other solutions. Once you have integrated an application into Okta and onboarded a user, they will be onboarded for just-in-time provisioning."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful."
"The provisioning functionality has been the most valuable. This solution has good performance, fast integration and is very responsive."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"They should have a landing page."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
"The training is too costly."
"The pricing could be improved."
"In my country, there's a lot of stealing of mobile phones, and mobile phones are the authentication device through the Okta application. If someone should steal my mobile phone, which is very common in my country, he or she might have access to my company account. That's my concern."
"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."
"There are some issues with the interface that can be improved."
"You can't hide the device when you're checking logs."
"RESTful Web Service calls and their response seem a bit slow."
Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 57 reviews. Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Keeper and Auth0, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.