We performed a comparison between Infor LX and Microsoft Dynamics AX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."
"Infor LX's most valuable feature is that it's very interactive."
"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software."
"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."
"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."
"A valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it is stable."
"It is easy to use, and it has a great UI. It has very well-structured modules. In terms of setup and configuration, they're logically placed, which makes it easy for any user to pick up information and learn more about the system, rather than just be plain key users of that business operating system."
"Microsoft Dynamics is very stable."
"The product is easier to use and has more efficient workflow management features than other vendors."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is customization."
"It was an okay solution when we delivered hardware and we had to do maintenance."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Dynamics AX are field services and the vendor collaboration portal. Both of the features are very good."
"The performance is good."
"It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time."
"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."
"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved."
"Infor's support side is not that good, and they seem to be focusing on other products above LX."
"We experienced some challenges with the mobile apps due to the insufficient processing capacity to handle the workload effectively."
"We do not have access to daily projections."
"Microsoft Dynamics AX could be improved by having more features available. We are going to 365 now, to use all the modules, because we found that there weren't many new things we were able to develop with AX. There were a lot of things that weren't available, so we are moving and integrating other things. The customization of upgrades should also be faster. We would also like to see more security features."
"The on-premises and desktop versions are not user-friendly."
"There is no Arabic interface in Microsoft Business Central, which is a big weak point."
"This solution could be improved with more expert resources and an easier implementation process."
"If I had to add something in the next release, it would probably be a mobile application for a sister application of Dynamics 365; not the ERP but the Dynamics 365 HR solution. It would definitely help if we could have Microsoft or a Microsoft partner introduce a mobile application for it."
"The UI has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."
Infor LX is ranked 18th in ERP with 4 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 52 reviews. Infor LX is rated 7.2, while Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Infor LX writes "A robust solution with excellent support that needs to modernize its server technology". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". Infor LX is most compared with Infor LN, SAP ERP and Infor M3, whereas Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP. See our Infor LX vs. Microsoft Dynamics AX report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.