We performed a comparison between Informatica Data Quality and SAP Data Quality Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Quality solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very useful for testing purposes and designing mappings for small projects. If you go for IDQ in the mapping itself, you can see the data. You can then correct it, and test it so easily. It is working fine. It is also stable, scalable, and easy to deploy."
"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"I am impressed by the solution's interface."
"There are a couple of valuable features. One is that it is very quick on the profiling. So, you get a very fast snapshot of the type of data that you're looking at from the profiling perspective. It can highlight anomalies in the data."
"The user interface is flexible and the visibility of the data flow is amazing."
"We are able to set rules, establish a data quality management platform, and monitor the quality."
"The solution is applicable for both technical and business users."
"Informatica Data Quality is a product that is worth the money."
"Our primary use case is for us to inspect the results from the product and material, and for releasing or leaving the status of the product."
"We work with API standards or norms for internal applications, so it's essential for SSE to have tests and pass those tests according to the criteria, which makes SAP Data Quality Management very important for our products."
"Informatica is very expensive."
"Their UI needs improvement. Their scorecards and reporting also need improvement. Their data quality reporting, especially their dashboards and scorecards, is lackluster at best. Its reporting capabilities are limited. If you want to do anything beyond its limited reporting capabilities, then you're going to have to use an external reporting tool such as Power BI or something like that."
"There is room for improvement in the Data Marketplace aspect."
"It can be improved in terms of performance and execution. I'm expecting better performance. It currently has some restrictions in terms of execution. For example, if we want to run it in the command mode and execute it, there are some restrictions, and we are facing some issues with a huge volume of data. These restrictions are not there in Informatica PowerCenter because we are able to execute a huge volume of data, and there are more ways to execute it."
"I would like to see better visuals for business users, such as a dashboard where they can precisely track where problems are."
"Although we are very satisfied with the design of the UI, executing tasks with it can be difficult."
"One area that could use improvement is the speed of the web interfaces. At present, they are very slow. I think it is essential that we are original and robust on-premises."
"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"I would like for them to develop a feature to able to record all of our inspections; so all the data can go through SAP. It's not user-friendly or easy to get further analysis, so we mostly skip this step."
"SAP Data Quality Management would be better if it directly integrates with the ME system. Right now, the company has a lot of machines on the shop floor working as a standalone, so you have to use all methods to ensure that the data interface appears on the ME system and that SAP Data Quality Management records the QM results. It would be much easier if the ME system could be integrated directly with SAP Data Quality Management."
Informatica Data Quality is ranked 1st in Data Quality with 18 reviews while SAP Data Quality Management is ranked 5th in Data Quality with 2 reviews. Informatica Data Quality is rated 7.8, while SAP Data Quality Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Data Quality writes "Offers cloud version, good connectivity and data profiling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Quality Management writes "Scalable, stable, and offers good technical support". Informatica Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Quality, Talend Data Quality, Trillium TS Quality, Oracle Data Quality and Ataccama ONE Platform, whereas SAP Data Quality Management is most compared with SAP Data Services, SAP Information Steward, Melissa Data Quality, Informatica Address Verification and Syniti Data Quality. See our Informatica Data Quality vs. SAP Data Quality Management report.
See our list of best Data Quality vendors.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.