We performed a comparison between JBoss ESB and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The solution is very easy to use. I can download the trial version and just give it a go."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"The solution has a good graphical interface."
"Mule Expression Language"
"The solution improved my company by modernizing the way we offer services and improving the user experience."
"The EPA, from what I understand, lacks a lot of features and it doesn't really know how to interface with legacy systems or how to develop APIs for legacy systems."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"Community editions need more attention."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvement in the generator for the DataWeave language so that it's a little more graphic."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
Earn 20 points
JBoss ESB is ranked 14th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. JBoss ESB is rated 7.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JBoss ESB writes "Easy to use with flexible pricing, but needs more flexibility surrounding integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". JBoss ESB is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Oracle Service Bus, IBM Integration Bus and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Fiorano ESB.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
