We performed a comparison between Kaseya VSA and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Kesaya is highly configurable."
"The most valuable feature of Kaseya VSA is the ability to control laptops remotely."
"The product's support team is very quick to respond, especially because the tool's technical team operates in the same time zone where I am located."
"The most valuable part of this solution is the security features that it offers."
"When compared to what we were previously using, one of the most appealing features is that it combines remote control, patch management, and software management into a single portal."
"The patch management and the remote support are very good, especially the remote support. There is a module built into the solution which allows remote control without necessarily interrupting the user. We could manage things in the background without them seeing or interacting with anything, which is a very useful feature."
"Kaseya VSA's best features are auditing and reporting."
"We can schedule the patching of the endpoints."
"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."
"Provides great insight into the functionalities of the data scope."
"The technical support is good."
"The solution is stable."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager gives different tools in one solution."
"Technical support is very helpful and very responsive."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"Valuable features include configurations enforcement, compliance data gathering, and deployment of a standardized OS."
"I would like to see improved virtual infrastructure management."
"It never functioned as intended."
"We actually upgraded the solution due to the fact that we needed the support for Apple devices. We haven't had a chance to test that part of the product just yet, however, that was our biggest criticism of the product prior to this most recent update."
"The deployment process could be better."
"The agent-based monitoring solution can be improved."
"The user interface is somewhat outdated."
"The way it is laid out can be improved. If it could be a little more intuitive, it might be a little bit easier. Sometimes, it is hard to find features because they're called something weird, or they're in an interesting location that you wouldn't have thought that they'd be in."
"It's very difficult to update the third-party software on every device."
"The TSM component could be improved."
"They need to improve the support for the Mac operating system."
"It is not easy to get good technical support, especially at level one."
"I'm looking for a single solution for all discovery needs. It fulfills about 40% of the requirements, and I'd like to see the other 60% so that I don't have to keep doing this."
"The solution can be improved with the addition of a mobile device manager."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could improve the integration."
"The time the solution takes for updating systems could be quicker. For example, the system information status is not updating as it should. Additionally, the database synchronization querying is slow and could be improved."
"The solution does not support remote devices so the CMG is still required."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaseya VSA is ranked 4th in Patch Management with 29 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews. Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Kaseya VSA is most compared with ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Datto Remote Monitoring and Management and N-able N-central, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Zabbix. See our Kaseya VSA vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.