We performed a comparison between LogicManager and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."Out of the box solution that doesn't require any special setup."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"Its user interface is pretty neat, and there is flexibility in generating the data. You can customize reports at any level. You can directly get reports in Tableau format. If you want to generate statistical data, you can create reports with graphs. There is an adequate amount of flexibility for changing the format, the type of graphs, etc."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"A little too expensive."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"The design and advanced workflow need to be improved."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"It would be nice if RSA Archer featured more customization. When customers are updating, they should be notified whether certain updates are optional. The install screen should not proceed to the next page unless we make some selections about which updates we want to install."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
"There should be a way to export and get data from the system in PDF or PowerPoint presentation format. This would be a great addition."
"Its customization features could be better."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
Earn 20 points
LogicManager is ranked 21st in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. LogicManager is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogicManager writes "Out of the box and ready to go with excellent support available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". LogicManager is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.