We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The stability of the solution is OK."
"This is the easiest and best tool available."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"It can scale."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"It is not performing well."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It should give better control over account management."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
Earn 20 points
Magic xpi Integration Platform is ranked 24th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews. Magic xpi Integration Platform is rated 3.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Magic xpi Integration Platform writes "A low-performing integration tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Magic xpi Integration Platform is most compared with Mule ESB, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
