We performed a comparison between Magic xpi Integration Platform and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The stability of the solution is OK."
"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"It is easily deployable and manageable. It has microservices-based architecture, which means that you can deploy the solution based on your needs, and you can manage the solution very easily."
"The setup is straightforward."
"Mule Expression Language"
"The cloud and integration abilities are most useful allowing us to use applications such as Salesforce and DataWeave."
"It is not performing well."
"One area that could be improved is the way that policies are propagated when APIs are moved from one environment to another. It's an issue, but when you develop and test the rest APIs in a lower environment and need to move them, there's a propagation process. This process moves certain aspects of the APIs, like the basic features. But when we move them, the policies don't always move with them. The policies should be able to move so we don't have to redo them manually. There are some APIs we use, but it's a bit tedious."
"The solution isn't as stable as we'd like it to be. There are some ongoing issues and therefore Mule has to provide frequent patches. Mule's core IP should be more stable overall."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
"The initial setup is not easy."
Earn 20 points
Magic xpi Integration Platform is ranked 24th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Magic xpi Integration Platform is rated 3.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Magic xpi Integration Platform writes "A low-performing integration tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Magic xpi Integration Platform is most compared with , whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
