We performed a comparison between MetricStream and RiskOptics ROAR Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."Key features are usability and ease of configuration. It allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."
"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."
"We can get all the information about all the applications in a single platform."
"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."
"After you change and save the pre-filled specific information at the end of an application page, the application will again take you to the top of the page."
Earn 20 points
MetricStream is ranked 12th in GRC while RiskOptics ROAR Platform is ranked 22nd in GRC with 1 review. MetricStream is rated 8.6, while RiskOptics ROAR Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of MetricStream writes "Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RiskOptics ROAR Platform writes "Acts as a software inventory of applications in an environment". MetricStream is most compared with RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC and Workiva Wdesk, whereas RiskOptics ROAR Platform is most compared with Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.