We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure API Management and SAP Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We're pretty much using all of the monetizations features out of the API manager so we can put up a portal and have a dev portal and then a prod portal and do rate limiting."
"The most valuable feature is the developer portal, which has source code examples in various programming languages to help developers learn the API."
"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."
"The API management and the hosting of the API platform are great."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure API Management are the easy configuration and deployment with automation."
"The package as a whole is useful for our customers."
"This solution is very flexible, and it's very compatible with the other Azure products."
"Monitoring: It gives us a detailed overview of how clients are using the API and it allows us to see the consumption trends in real-time."
"The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities."
"The most beneficial feature for our clients is the easy access to their information, achieved effortlessly through integration."
"The technical support services are good."
"The solution is easy to use."
"I rate the technical support from Microsoft Azure API Management a four out of five."
"Technical support could be more flexible and try to meet the client's needs a bit more effectively."
"Sometimes when immediate support is required, it isn't available."
"The scalability of this solution could be improved. The volume which the API Management task service can handle needs to be improved. Cost wise, this solution could be optimized."
"When you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price."
"The licensing fees should be cheaper."
"The solution’s security and performance could be improved."
"There is always room for improvement. There should be more analytics abilities so you can know how much traffic there is. Log Analyzer isn't well integrated with this solution."
"The instances are costly."
"They could provide graphical data for over-viewing metrics such as payments, receipts, creditors, and refunds."
"The product's UI could be faster."
"The setup process for the SAP integration Suite is not straightforward. It involves some technical aspects and can be complex."
More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 68 reviews while SAP Integration Suite is ranked 24th in API Management with 4 reviews. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8, while SAP Integration Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Efficiently manages and monetizes API ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Integration Suite writes "Has many add-on services and supports different authentication methods ". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Gateway Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas SAP Integration Suite is most compared with MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Axway AMPLIFY API Management. See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. SAP Integration Suite report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.