We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is excellent at figuring how to build an application in three months. It makes it very quick and easy."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly."
"I would say that it's a very advanced product because it empowers people to do simple things, which previously may have required people to have some technical skills."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"The product has good usability, in terms of low-code applications."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"Overall the solution is reliable."
"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."
"This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data."
"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."
"Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed)."
"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait."
"It is low-code. We are able to go in and create apps quickly. It is very helpful for the size of our company. We're a mid-size company, and at this moment, we don't need anything externally. We don't have to go out and consult a consulting firm to build something from the ground up. So, the ease of that and being able to get development quickly up and running has been good for us."
"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge."
"The product is easy to use."
"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"The solution should have more integration with other platforms."
"We would like to see the period for viewing executions within this solution to be extended beyond its current limit of 28 days. We would prefer to be able to offer our customers an infinite amount of history to search."
"The price could be lower."
"It has to improve the threshold limit where it can handle data beyond 5000 items."
"We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it."
"It would be good if this solution supports standard BPN operations. We are thinking of switching to a BPM solution next year because it is not a BPM solution."
"The dashboard is not organized."
". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider."
"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."
"This rule: The Maximum is 60 rules. We need to provide more in order to improve."
"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."
"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."
"I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate."
"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 74 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Bizagi, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Sales Creatio, Oracle Fusion Service, OutSystems, ServiceNow and Mendix. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. QuickBase report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.