We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"The solution doesn't require much code writing and we can develop APIs very easily."
"The solution improved my company by modernizing the way we offer services and improving the user experience."
"The connectors help to connect with a variety of applications."
"Scalability and load balancing."
"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"The stability could be improved."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"The payment system needs improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvement in the generator for the DataWeave language so that it's a little more graphic."
"Technical support needs to be better."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 10th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse, whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
