We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The most powerful feature is DataWeave, which is a powerful language where data can be transformed from one form into another."
"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"The architecture based on events has several connectors which allow integration from external and internal applications of the company."
"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"The installation process is easy."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite and webMethods Integration Server, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and TIBCO BusinessWorks. See our Mule ESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
