We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability overall has been pretty great."
"The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies."
"Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability."
"MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager has the most valuable data components and can integrate APIs across multiple microservices."
"It can create high-cost solutions, allowing for a great deal of customization to make it well-suited for specific needs."
"The most valuable features are API development and API management."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability."
"It provides all of the robust platform-enabled features."
"In our landscape, we have a lot of AS/400s or iSeries and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) has a file service listener that allows data to seamlessly be transferred between the SEEBURGER solution and the AS/400."
"SEEBURGER BIS can reconcile documentation, like our accounts payable and statements within the system. If you are manually doing it, then it is really time consuming with a lot of errors. Whereas, SEEBURGER BIS allows for a lot of basic level programming within the documentation, filtering, and sorting out VLOOKUP. It lets us get two database tables from two different systems, then merge them based on the logic that we provide. So, it is a very helpful product."
"We had a requirement for transferring data to Amazon S3 buckets but we did not have a solution in our shop for large data transfers to Amazon S3. We worked with SEEBURGER and created a framework solution and now, using that solution, we can configure the transfer in an hour or two and enable it to go to existing or new S3 buckets."
"We rarely get hanged processes."
"The platform has been very consistent and responsive."
"The ease of integration of the SEEBURGER product into SAP was pretty seamless. There wasn't any trouble, there weren't any complexities."
"With SEEBURGER BIS, you can string as many different activities together in your workflows as you want. You can put them in any order, like a piece of code. One leads into the next, which leads into the next. It is just very flexible from that vantage point. This makes it so easy to use and reduces the number of moving parts that you need to have. It is just a lot less frustrating not having to conform to how some other vendor software works."
"It used to take half an hour to move one file from one location to another. Now, it takes 10 minutes."
"Their analytics needs a lot of improvement. It's really lacking right now."
"The initial setup, if you go back three or three and a half years, definitely, for us, was complex."
"They should develop on MuleSoft as it would be a good way of improving API monetization."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"MuleSoft has advanced features but is slower."
"The setup process could be simpler."
"An area for improvement in MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is the process of applying policies because it's manual. It would be great if MuleSoft could make the process easier, particularly by automating it."
"We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability."
"The initial set up was done by SEEBURGER consulting. It can be complex due to various factors, such as server settings, database settings, and security settings."
"I would like there to be a feature that could handle the limited server."
"All the topics we've identified have been placed on the SEEBURGER roadmap already... Among the things we have requested are improvements in the user interface and improvements that would be implemented by completely new modules or improvements in their Cloud Services."
"I find the solution quite confusing to use, especially when looking at the tree structure."
"The integration is not so excellent. While I'm not saying there is a problem, there is no pattern. When we start a new project, we have to work with new people and processes every time. The technical side of their system is very good, but their change process is not repeatable. It needs to be rebuilt each time."
"A true debugger that allows you to step through the process would be a good improvement. Right now, we are limited to reading the log file generated by the test screen in Mapping Designer."
"It's rather difficult to understand, from the application, what's broken and why it doesn't work. We typically need to get support from them directly, and it's usually in a consulting role, to fix issues."
"Java is very old technology and they should move away from it, to anything that's better."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 48 reviews while SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is ranked 19th in API Management with 37 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite writes "Gives us the flexibility to hook up to systems using any protocol out there". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is most compared with SAP Cloud Platform, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, Mule ESB, IBM B2B Integrator and Microsoft Azure API Management. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.