We performed a comparison between N-able N-central and NinjaOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."
"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."
"The solution's service is good."
"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."
"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."
"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."
"NinjaOne has a feature where we can create custom scripts that we can run on devices remotely."
"The solution's most valuable feature is related to its remote access...I know that NinjaOne's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."
"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."
"It just works as advertised and serves the purpose for which we got it."
"Good at managing updates and for remote support."
"The installation is easy, it only took two minutes."
"The integration with other applications could be better."
"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."
"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."
"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."
"The solution's overall integration should be improved."
"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."
"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."
"The ticketing system in NinjaOne is not the best."
"Lacks sufficient integrations with other PSAs."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."
"NinjaOne's pricing and user interface needs improvement."
"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."
"The remote connectivity could be better. It works most of the time, but sometimes, there are issues."
N-able N-central is ranked 5th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 5 reviews while NinjaOne is ranked 1st in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 14 reviews. N-able N-central is rated 9.0, while NinjaOne is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of N-able N-central writes "User-friendly graphical user interface and offers versatile functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NinjaOne writes "A tool that helps with a lot of configurations and creates automation processes that work perfectly". N-able N-central is most compared with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, Atera, ConnectWise Automate, Kaseya VSA and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas NinjaOne is most compared with Atera, Microsoft Configuration Manager, LogMeIn Central, ConnectWise Automate and Kaseya VSA. See our N-able N-central vs. NinjaOne report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.