We performed a comparison between NetSuite OneWorld and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Lowers costs, produces higher efficiencies, while maintaining a leaner staff and produces advanced financials."
"The executive dashboards have satisfied the founders and leadership with up to the minute information. This allows them to make high level decisions."
"The ability to customize it to create custom fields that are reportable, and then to be able to write script behind it to automate other processes that might otherwise be manual is great."
"NetSuite is a great solution, fast to bring up and makes everyone's life easier."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"The solution is scalable."
"Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"Utilizes best practices that are simple to implement."
"When correctly configured, this is a very stable solution. We have customers running their process automation manufacturing based off of this solution."
"The most valuable features are straight-through processing because we need to make sure that we have a good end-to-end process."
"EBS has lots of application families and lots of features. It is modular in deployment and flexible enough to let the customer increase the built-in capabilities and enable new applications when needed. These are very important things at hand in case there will be a need to expand the product capabilities and/or implement new projects."
"The interface is easy to use."
"It provides a well-centered database that is feature rich."
"The on-premise is very similar to the cloud version."
"It is scalable."
"The financial module has excellent features that many find valuable, while the HCM module is also highly regarded."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"I hope NetSuite OneWorld introduces features like support for different pricing models, including packaging options, and improved production planning tools in the future."
"There is not a 20 year pedigree of pharma experience in the NetSuite channel. While there are many of these CMO Pharma companies rapidly moving to NetSuite, there are few consultants with true pharma experience. Those who have experience are stretched pretty thin."
"Currently, NetSuite OneWorld needs to be more mature, especially compared to SAP."
"Certain analytics features are missing that I've come to expect from other systems. Additionally, there are occasional issues with data accuracy that need to be addressed. Overall, deeper analytics capabilities would greatly improve the tool's usefulness for me."
"In NetSuite OneWorld, what needs improvement is the production planning functionality."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
"The implementation can take quite a bit of time."
"The operations could be better, specifically for manufacturing processes."
"Oracle has improved a lot because Oracle E-Business Suite is quite outdated. Oracle built the Oracle Fusion platform and it has many improved processes. We registered a few enhancements requests, but it's a very long bureaucratic process with Oracle. It doesn't make any sense to communicate with Oracle about what changes should be made to the system."
"It would be great to see Oracle E-Business Suite become less dependent on the SAO solution, which is an integration solution for Oracle platforms."
"We would like to see some automation in this solution."
"Oracle E-Business Suite could improve the tables. When we remove some of them sometimes they cloud the modules into one. It becomes a little difficult to segregate."
"The system has bugs, is not user friendly, and requires too much customization."
"Oracle E-Business Suite uses an old technology (Forms), which is Java-based."
NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 14th in ERP with 14 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 5th in ERP with 141 reviews. NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, Oracle HCM Cloud, NetSuite ERP and Salesforce Sales Cloud. See our NetSuite OneWorld vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.