We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"Allows to use workflow for simple approvals and LazyApproval. The feature is easy to implement for mobile approval."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"The solution provides data mining and AI features."
"We can use workflow manager to create forms."
"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."
"The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it."
"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."
"It is a stable solution."
"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."
"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."
"Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint."
"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."
"The solution is complex."
"There are a lot of challenges with Process Manager. For example, we wanted to create a process map from an Excel sheet, but Signavio doesn't have that capability. I have raised this issue with Signavio support, but it is one of the bottlenecks we are currently facing."
"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and ARIS BPA, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
