We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Perforce QA Wizard Pro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."It is a stable solution."
"This product is easy to use, understand, and maintain."
"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."
"UFT is very strongly built. It's widely used, so there's a lot of support."
"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."
"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."
"With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources."
"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."
"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."
"Technical support could be improved."
"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."
"You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out."
"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."
"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"We'd like it to have less scripting."
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."
Earn 20 points
OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 89 reviews while Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with .
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
