"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."
"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."
"It allows us to respond faster to issues. If there are issues that come out, we're able to capture a message and alert somebody about it."
"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."
"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."
"It is an easy product to use and it is stable."
"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."
"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."
"We have not had any major issues in approximately 15 years."
"When we changed to JES3, the programmers didn't have to know anything. The product provided the same interface with the same look and feel."
"Between the tech support and the person I was working with, they have been extraordinary."
"I use most of the SMS space management extensively, but also the features that enable me to look at dumps and different dataset allocations to the system, and performance data from the queueing and delays."
"Thresholds with alerts are valuable, enabling us to fix a problem before it has an impact."
"The scalability is absolutely fine."
"The stability is very reliable. We have not had any issues."
"Ability for system diagnostics"
"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."
"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."
"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."
"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."
"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."
"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script."
"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."
"It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process."
"The things that I would think about would be in relation to JES3. However, I don't know if they'll be able to do much more with that because I don't know how much longer IBM is going to be supporting JES3. So I can understand not doing additional development. But if I were to suggest something it would be the JES3 initiators, the JES3 queues."
"We are using Datacom as the database system, so maybe a little bit more integration with that."
"It confuses a lot of people because there are so many features, but when they see me bouncing around they say, "I didn't know it did that, I didn't know it did that." It takes a long time to find all the different features that are available."
"The documentation format could be better. I noticed with the last release that all of the manuals were bundled into one. It used to have a separate installation guide, user guide, etc."
"The documentation, like installation guides and stuff, put it all in one place."
"If a unit of work ID is associated with a CICS, a DB2, and a MQ transaction, and having that capability correlate to those different technologies via one business application transaction which would be beneficial."
"They are already working on improvements. One of them is the operational intelligence, which is a lot of stuff I am trying to learn and work on right now, which SYSVIEW reports to that all the system things which are going on."
More SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is ranked 6th in Mainframe Management while SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is ranked 5th in Mainframe Management. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is rated 9.4, while SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence writes "The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence writes "Applications see what's wrong with a transaction and make corrections". OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is most compared with BMC MainView, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and SCOM, whereas SYSVIEW Performance Intelligence is most compared with IBM Tivoli OMEGAMON, BMC MainView, ASG TMON and BMC Automated Mainframe Intelligence.
See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.
We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
