Oracle BPM vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
1,995 views|1,621 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
8,504 views|5,599 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is straightforward.""This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations.""The support is good.""One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles.""One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive.""The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work.""What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful.""I find the data lineage features most valuable."

More Oracle BPM Pros →

"All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops.""The benefit of this application is that I can immediately describe processes and form normative documents for these processes. For me, this is definitely a plus. Сurrently, I work in a company that is not involved in the structural alignment of business processes. They have huge gaps in this. Nothing is described and there are no norms. Therefore, the formation of regulatory documents, rules, and descriptions of processes, not only in graphic form, but also in documentary form is an absolute plus. I have not found this in other process programs.""The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need.""The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice.""I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it.""It is a very scalable solution.""We can use workflow manager to create forms.""It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Pros →

Cons
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure.""The product must reduce its cost.""Pricing is an area that could use improvement.""Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better.""We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues.""Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart.""You have to maintain it manually.""Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."

More Oracle BPM Cons →

"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions.""I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones.""The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously.""One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process.""If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you.""There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen.""SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."
  • "The licensing model is good."
  • "It's pried high, this solution is expensive."
  • "The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."
  • "This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."
  • "I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."
  • "Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."
  • "The pricing is very expensive."
  • More Oracle BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."
  • "My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."
  • "I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."
  • "I think we're spending about $150,000 a year on licensing costs."
  • "SaaS has no setup cost, just licensing fees."
  • "This solution provides really great value for the money."
  • "We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."
  • "Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."
  • More SAP Signavio Process Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution provides extensive functionalities.
    Top Answer:The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses.
    Top Answer:The product must reduce its cost. It will help it compete with other open-source tools evolving in the market.
    Top Answer:SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a… more »
    Top Answer:The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand… more »
    Top Answer:We have a yearly basis license. We don't find it too expensive for our use case. It helps us harmonize processes and those processes result in significant effort saving, then the product is paid for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,995
    Comparisons
    1,621
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    502
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    8,504
    Comparisons
    5,599
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    475
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Oracle Business Process Management
    Signavio Process Editor
    Learn More
    SAP
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

    The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

    Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

    Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

    Sample Customers
    State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie
    DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Healthcare Company12%
    Retailer10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Oracle BPM is rated 7.4, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and Bizagi. See our Oracle BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.