We performed a comparison between Oracle Database In-Memory and Tibero based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It accelerates query processing, which in turn speeds up operations and streamlines workflow, and ultimately enhancing productivity."
"The scalability is very good."
"Normally, every database server uses hard disks. In-Memory has a feature, apart from their database, which is very good. When we start our server, all your data needs loading memory. We can use that. It's a very good feature. I think they added this feature in 2019. We can mount memory in the partition, create partitions in there, and create table space from that spot to share. It's a really good feature. We use it a lot."
"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."
"The most valuable aspects of this solution are the fast caching and improved performance to the database"
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"We can integrate it with any data sources as well."
"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."
"Tibero uses Hyper-Threading architecture, which is incredibly fast."
"Tibero is very easy to setup and maintain."
"The most valuable feature is compatibility with the Oracle database."
"Tibero is a relational database management system, which supports disaster recovery, active cluster, active storage, etc."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."
"They should improve the solution's scalability for large databases."
"Oracle should include column store or advanced query optimization so a database can be optimized by enabling analytic queries to run faster."
"The product could be more economical."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable."
"In PL/SQL code, there is a scope of improvement. We expect more PL/SQL packages should be included in the next release."
"The knowledge base is quite small and should be expanded."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 8th in Relational Databases Tools with 27 reviews while Tibero is ranked 25th in Relational Databases Tools. Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.8, while Tibero is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "User friendly with great scalability but needs to move toward intelligent AI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tibero writes "A stable and cost-effective tool that is fully compatible with Oracle". Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, IBM Db2 Database, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, SQL Server and Apache Derby, whereas Tibero is most compared with Oracle Database, MariaDB, MySQL, SQL Server and Altibase. See our Oracle Database In-Memory vs. Tibero report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
