We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Sopera Advanced Service Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that you can connect with different applications."
"This product is not complicated and very easy to learn."
"I have found the best feature are the administrative controls."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"The connectivity with the solution is an area that needs to be improved. On occasion, requests are lost due to losing connectivity."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"This solution is running on the Eclipse platform and this is where all the designing takes place. The Eclipse performance should be improved. The Open Studio tool we have been using for the development is not up to the industry standard and the performance should be improved."
More Sopera Advanced Service Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is ranked 18th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Sopera Advanced Service Factory is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sopera Advanced Service Factory writes "Functional administrative controls, highly scalable, and reliable". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Sopera Advanced Service Factory is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.