We performed a comparison between Palantir Foundry and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers very good end-to-end capabilities."
"The data lineage is great."
"The virtualization tool is useful."
"It's scalable."
"Palantir Foundry is a robust platform that has really strong plugin connectors and provides features for real-time integration."
"Encapsulates all the components without the requirement to integrate or check compatibility."
"It is easy to map out a workflow and run trigger-based scripts without having to deploy to another server."
"The ease of use is my favorite feature. We're able to build different models and projects or combine different projects to build one use case."
"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."
"The stability is good."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."
"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"Difficult to receive data from external sources."
"They do not have a data center in Europe, and we have lots of personally identifiable information in our dataset that needs to be hosted by a third-party data center like Amazon or Microsoft Azure."
"It would be helpful to build applications based on Azure functions or web apps in Palantir Foundry."
"It requires a lot of manual work and is very time-consuming to get to a functional point."
"Compared to other hyperscalers, Palantir Foundry is complex and not so user-intuitive."
"Cost of this solution is quite high."
"The workflow could be improved."
"The frontend capabilities of Palantir Foundry could be improved."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Palantir Foundry is ranked 12th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Palantir Foundry is rated 7.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Palantir Foundry writes "The data visualization is fantastic and the security is excellent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Palantir Foundry is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Palantir Gotham, SAP Data Services, AWS Glue and Alteryx Designer, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our Palantir Foundry vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.