We performed a comparison between Pentera and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The product is easy to use."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The assessment is most valuable."
"The most valuable features of Rapid7 InsightVM are the accurate level of scanning and the workflows are good."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"We feel the interface is very good. It is very easy to use, even a nontechnical person can use it."
"It is a stable solution."
"When it comes to the process, installation is very easy and does not take long."
"I rate InsightVM eight out of 10 for ease of setup. It takes two or three engineers to deploy. The solution requires some maintenance. It's mainly cleaning up data."
"I liked the dashboard on it. I could customize my dashboard with different widgets and different heat maps."
"The price could be improved."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"In order to be able to properly test the solution and make a decision, I would like to receive the test license code instantly and eliminate the wait time."
"We have some issues with how it scans patches."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
"The reporting could be better."
"Their customer support should be improved, and the effectiveness of scans also needs to be improved."
"Reporting could be expanded."
"The InsightVM cannot scan if we connect to our customer by the VPN."
Pentera is ranked 12th in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Pentera is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Picus Security, Horizon3.ai and Tenable One Exposure Management Platform, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Rapid7 Metasploit.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.