We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessDesigner and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"The reason we chose Signavio is it's a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling data tool, with data capture behind it, as well as a collaborative nature. A lot of it comes out of the box and requires less technology involvement. It can be run well by the business users. That's what we really like about it."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager is the ability to do business process models."
"The features I find most valuable are ease of use and the Collaboration Hub."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."
"The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
"If you're going to use the tool the way I'm using it, which is to work with businesses and capture what they're thinking, it would be helpful to be able to insert other objects onto a diagram."
"The price can be made cheaper."
"Being able to integrate the Workflow Accelerator with more products would be good."
"The solution is complex."
"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."
"The licensing model could be better."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our QPR ProcessDesigner vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
