We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"Intuitive and easy to use."
"One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements."
"With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."
"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process."
"The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities."
"Qualys could be improved in its overall performance compared to other vulnerability management or scanning tools."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"They're still evolving their platform in terms of reporting capabilities."
"We face issues while scanning multiple assets."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"Qualys currently does not have any features for scanning SCADA, IoT, and Industrial Control Systems."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."
"There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for."
"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions."
"SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Panorays.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
