We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most recent is VMDR, which provides a comprehensive overview of how to detect, patch, and remediate specific vulnerabilities."
"Provides great functionality."
"Qualys VM is very stable."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"Qualys VM had a recent upgrade and the newer version is supporting the cloud."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"The reporting is fine."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"PingSafe has a dashboard that can detect the criticality of a particular problem, whether it falls under critical, medium, or low vulnerability."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features."
"I did a lot of research before signing up and doing the demo. They have a good reputation as far as catching threats early on."
"The visibility is the best part of the solution."
"They should make it accessible for more operating systems."
"I would like to have CSPM, a continuous scan-like cloud added to the solution."
"Certain integration factors between different options could be improved."
"The reporting in this solution can be improved."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"I want PingSafe to integrate additional third-party resources. For example, PingSafe is compatible with Azure and AWS, but Azure AD isn't integrated with AWS. If PingSafe had that ability, it would enrich the data because how users interact with our AWS environment is crucial. All the identity-related features require improvement."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have."
"I'd like to see better onboarding documentation."
"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."
"When you find a vulnerability and resolve it, the same issue will not occur again. I want PingSafe to block the same vulnerability from appearing again. I want something like a playbook where the steps that we take to resolve an issue are repeated when that issue happens again."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
More Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne Pricing and Cost Advice →
Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews while Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is ranked 6th in Container Security with 67 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne writes "Provides excellent workload telemetry, hunting capabilities, and deep visibility ". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Orca Security, AWS GuardDuty and Sysdig Secure. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
