We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Tech support is helpful."
"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."
"Qualys VM's best features are vulnerability management and customizable scoring."
"We also like the flexibility in their licensing."
"The solution shows us classic categories, including high, medium, and low risks. It also shows critical items, and that gives us the advantage of prioritizing things."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"The reporting is fine."
"Easy to scale, stable solution for workload and server security and protection. It's easy to set up and has a good ransomware protection feature."
"For day-to-day efficiency, it provides a good dashboard, so our team can be active 24/7 instead of doing a lot of manual stuff. We just look at the dashboard, and it's all done."
"Deep Security is a good product for managing a few servers."
"The solution has a low footprint and does not have a lot of impact on the host."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
"You can scale the solution to different versions."
"I switched to Trend Micro because of its good marketing techniques."
"Aside from the basic antivirus features, there are additional features such as vulnerability protection, firewall, etc. which are helpful."
"Could use additional security for the app."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"They have integrated with other third parties, but it is still not viable."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"Improve the API speed."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
"The implementation can be inflexible and not easy, as it requires knowledge of things like virtualization and administration on Windows."
"Trend Micro is scalable if you have the budget for it."
"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."
"Enhancements in agent performance are needed, specifically in reducing server utilization during scanning."
"The solution could use more integration."
"The problem with this solution is that if you go on large sites you have to have an external database, which would increase the cost."
"It needs better global visibility of the virtual environment."
"The email relays and proxies could be improved."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.