We performed a comparison between Quest InTrust and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"Splunk has significantly helped with aggregation and correlation of critical logs. Not having to grep on each individual server has made everyone more efficient."
"The initial setup is simple, not very complex. Initial deployment takes around 10 to 15 minutes to set up the entire base for Splunk including all three tiers."
"It can log more logs than other solutions. It's a good way to troubleshoot problems."
"The level of robustness on offer is very good."
"Splunk has improved our operations by giving us access to more information and allowing us to deploy more use cases."
"With good domain knowledge, one can build almost anything. If you throw in Alert Manager or an integration with ServiceNow. Then, you have your own SIEM"
"The best part of Splunk Enterprise Security is its customizable settings."
"It is user-friendly. It is more effective than other solutions. The support and help for troubleshooting and the documentation from Splunk make it very effective."
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"Their technical support sucks."
"I feel as though a major focus of upcoming releases should be set on Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, and I would enjoy to see more security focused add-ons and apps developed by the vendor."
"I haven't found a way for me to create my own plugins and integrate them into Splunk, but this isn't necessarily a limitation; it could simply be a lack of knowledge on my part."
"Its user interface for everything other than the charts can be improved. Some parts of it can be simplified a bit, such as when importing documents that have the network traffic. When you're going through the information about the network traffic, you have to have the expertise, but even if a program is supposed to be for IT support, it is good to make it user-friendly because it gets easier to train people. When something goes wrong, the more difficult a program is in terms of UI, the harder it is to fix the issue."
"The UI can be difficult to understand for non-technical people."
"Many of my clients want to get better at Splunk, but they're afraid of using the tool because they feel it's too complex for them."
"We had some connections issues with the solution at the beginning."
"I would like to see future development in terms of ML (Machine Learning)."
Earn 20 points
Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Log Management with 244 reviews. Quest InTrust is rated 8.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.