We performed a comparison between RiskOptics ROAR Platform and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."We can get all the information about all the applications in a single platform."
"Its user interface is pretty neat, and there is flexibility in generating the data. You can customize reports at any level. You can directly get reports in Tableau format. If you want to generate statistical data, you can create reports with graphs. There is an adequate amount of flexibility for changing the format, the type of graphs, etc."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"Solution is scalable."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"The most valuable features are the advanced workflow and the dashboards. This tool can present data wonderfully to management, and it is easy for them to manage the risk plans."
"This solution helped us with the centralization of our governance data, so we could house all of our controls in one place. We could use that central repository of all our controls to build our risk management strategy and our policy and governance. So we could use controls as a central library and build policy, and then build risk management around it."
"The last project was for an investment group that was using Excel. Shifting their records from one position to another took approximately 15 minutes. In Archer, we created a workflow for them to leverage it, and they could send the single record with one click to one person within seconds. The whole process went from 15 minutes to two minutes to get the approval for the records. The main purpose of Archer is to just make it easy."
"After you change and save the pre-filled specific information at the end of an application page, the application will again take you to the top of the page."
"There are some issues with the interface for version 6.5 but these may already be repaired and simplified in the new versions that have been released."
"If you need to integrate the RSA products with another SEIM solution, then it doesn't work properly."
"There are certain restrictions on API integrations, and it is not simple or straightforward."
"Some of the error reporting isn't very clear. When you're looking for information on error codes, you got to do a lot of digging."
"There should be a way to export and get data from the system in PDF or PowerPoint presentation format. This would be a great addition."
"GUI could be improved."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
Earn 20 points
RiskOptics ROAR Platform is ranked 22nd in GRC with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. RiskOptics ROAR Platform is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RiskOptics ROAR Platform writes "Acts as a software inventory of applications in an environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". RiskOptics ROAR Platform is most compared with Workiva Wdesk, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.