We performed a comparison between SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"A valuable feature is its integration with Oracle Database."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides one place where you can control all of the services."
"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."
"Scalability on the solution is great. It's very very easy to scale."
"The program is scalable."
"The transaction handling of WebLogic and the way it is designed is excellent."
"The solution is useful for centralizing data."
"What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"I rate the scalability of WebLogic Suite an eight out of ten."
"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters."
"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."
"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
"The content search is not easy."
"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."
"This solution doesn't have connectors to other external applications."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 21st in Application Infrastructure while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, IBM WebSphere Application Server and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Microsoft .NET Framework, Oracle WebCenter, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus. See our SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal vs. WebLogic Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
