We performed a comparison between Trend Micro Cloud One and Wiz based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Trend Micro Cloud One and Wiz both offer valuable features for protecting against vulnerabilities and managing workloads. Trend Micro Cloud One excels in offering control over restrictions and total visibility, including insight into a microservice architecture. Meanwhile, Wiz prioritizes risks and offers easy-to-read dashboards with context, as well as automation roles. Trend Micro Cloud One needs work in areas such as pricing, automation, and licensing, as well as offering better documentation, logs, alerts, and flexibility. On the other hand, Wiz could benefit from preventive controls, refined reporting, customizable dashboards, improved risk assessment, and direct issue remediation.
Service and Support: Both Trend Micro Cloud One and Wiz have excellent technical support with knowledgeable and responsive staff. Wiz also offers easy access to account representatives and hand-holding during deployment. However, some customers suggest that Wiz could improve by making more information publicly accessible.
Ease of Deployment: Trend Micro Cloud One's setup was not universally easy, with some needing technical knowledge and others finding it simpler. The length of deployment varied, and a two-person team was suggested. Wiz was reported to be uncomplicated and quick to install, with some finishing in only a few hours. Wiz was mostly a SaaS tool that was low-maintenance and gave insight and analytics for cloud resources.
Pricing: Trend Micro Cloud One has mid-range pricing, whereas Wiz is on the pricier side. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is determined by the number of units, while Wiz has a straightforward pricing model that is deemed reasonable. However, there are worries about possible price hikes and a lack of pricing transparency with Wiz.
ROI: Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its flexibility and easy integration, while Wiz is known for its superior asset management and vulnerability identification. Additionally, Wiz's SaaS platform offers added value for users, helping with compliance and monitoring controls.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over Wiz based on user reviews. It has more comprehensive features, including virtual patching, login inspection, and control over server access and application installation. Wiz is praised for its ability to provide context and prioritize risks, but lacks preventive controls and refined reporting capabilities.
"The solution is a good alerting tool."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"We like PingSafe's vulnerability assessment and management features, and its vulnerability databases."
"Cloud Native Security's best feature is its ability to identify hard-coded secrets during pull request reviews."
"It is very straightforward. It is not complicated. For the information that it provides, it does a pretty good job."
"Cloud Native Security is user-friendly. Everything in the Cloud Native Security tool is straightforward, including detections, integration, reporting, etc. They are constantly improving their UI by adding plugins and other features."
"The UI is very good."
"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"Currently, we would have to export our vulnerability report to an .xlsx file, and review it in an Excel spreadsheet, and then we sort of compile a list from there. It would be cool if there was a way to actually toggle multiple applications for review and then see those file paths on multiple users rather than only one user at a time or only one application at a time."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
"There's room for improvement in the graphic explorer."
"Their search feature could be better."
"One of our use cases was setting up a firewall for our endpoints, specifically for our remote users... We were hoping to utilize SentinelOne's firewall capabilities, but there were limitations on how many URLs we could implement. Because of those limitations on the number of URLs, we weren't able to utilize that feature in the way we had hoped to."
"We wanted it to provide us with something like Claroty Hub in AWS for lateral movement. For example, if an EC2 instance or a virtual machine is compromised in a public subnet based on a particular vulnerability, such as Log4j, we want it to not be able to reach some of our databases. This kind of feature is not supported in PingSafe."
"We can customize security policies but lack auditing capabilities."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The pricing can get high."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 17 reviews while Wiz is ranked 2nd in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 11 reviews. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6, while Wiz is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wiz writes "Multiple features help us prioritize remediation, and agentless implementation reduces overhead". Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Wiz is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Orca Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS Security Hub and Lacework. See our Trend Vision One - Cloud Security vs. Wiz report.
See our list of best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors, best Container Security vendors, and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
