Algolia vs Elastic Search comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Algolia Logo
919 views|697 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Elastic Logo
3,755 views|1,273 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Algolia and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Search as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Search as a Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The Algolia solution really helped us to improve our conversion rate and click through rate.""It's scalable. It can be scaled massively."

More Algolia Pros →

"I am impressed with the product's Logstash. The tool is fast and customizable. You can build beautiful dashboards with it. It is useful and reliable.""The flexibility and the support for diverse languages that it provides for searching the database are most valuable. We can use different languages to query the database.""I like how it allows us to connect to Kafka and get this data in a document format very easily. Elasticsearch is very fast when you do text-based searches of documents. That area is very good, and the search is very good.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Enterprise Search is the Discovery option for the visualization of logs on a GPU instead of on the server.""The product is scalable with good performance.""The most valuable features are the detection and correlation features.""Search is really powerful.""Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time analytics with Elastic benefits us due to the huge traffic volume in our organization, which reaches up to 60,000 requests per second. With logs of approximately 25 GB per day, manually analyzing traffic behavior, payloads, headers, user agents, and other details is impractical."

More Elastic Search Pros →

Cons
"Joining is quite complex.""I think they could improve the analytics view."

More Algolia Cons →

"The documentation regarding customization could be better.""There is an index issue in which the data starts to crash as it increases.""The solution's integration and configuration are not easy. Not many people know exactly what to do.""There is a lack of technical people to develop, implement and optimize equipment operation and web queries.""The pricing of this product needs to be more clear because I cannot understand it when I review the website.""Elastic Enterprise Search's tech support is good but it could be improved.""They should improve its documentation. Their official documentation is not very informative. They can also improve their technical support. They don't help you much with the customized stuff. They also need to add more visuals. Currently, they have line charts, bar charts, and things like that, and they can add more types of visuals. They should also improve the alerts. They are not very simple to use and are a bit complex. They could add more options to the alerting system.""While integrating with tools like agents for ingesting data from sources like firewalls is valuable, I believe prioritizing improvements to the core product would be more beneficial."

More Elastic Search Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are currently on a contract with Algolia for licensing and price."
  • More Algolia Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The Algolia solution really helped us to improve our conversion rate and click through rate.
    Top Answer:We are currently on a contract with Algolia for licensing and price.
    Top Answer:I think they could improve the analytics view. I think they can improve by increasing the number of the terms that are searched every day on our website. If they doubled to two thousand terms that are… more »
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    919
    Comparisons
    697
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    9.0
    1st
    out of 13 in Search as a Service
    Views
    3,755
    Comparisons
    1,273
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Amazon AWS CloudSearch logo
    Compared 37% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Solr logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Amazon Athena logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview


    Algolia helps businesses across industries quickly create relevant, scalable, and lightning fast search and discovery experiences. Algolia’s mission is to make every search interaction meaningful and rewarding. Our hosted platform reduces the complexity of building relevant digital experiences. More than 7,500 companies like WW, Lacoste, Twitch, Medium and Stripe rely on Algolia’s enterprise-grade APIs to manage over 60 billion search queries a month.

    Founded in 2012, Algolia is backed by $74M in funding from Accel Partners, Alven Capital, Point Nine Capital and Storm Ventures. The team is headquartered in San Francisco with offices in Paris, London, New York, and Atlanta. To learn more, visit www.algolia.com.

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Sample Customers
    Birchbox, Twitch, Lacoste, Stripe, WW, Medium, Cousera, National Geographic, Zendesk, Magento
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Search as a Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Search as a Service. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Algolia is ranked 7th in Search as a Service with 2 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Search as a Service with 59 reviews. Algolia is rated 8.6, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Algolia writes "Documentation is the best part and worth the money if the search is the core feature of your product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Algolia is most compared with Amazon AWS CloudSearch, Amazon Kendra, Azure Search and Solr, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search and Amazon Athena.

    See our list of best Search as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Search as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.