We performed a comparison between Alteryx and RapidMiner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Predictive Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that I can merge data from different sources into one place."
"Alteryx has made us more agile and increased the speed and effectiveness of decision making."
"It is efficient in optimizing our ability to get information."
"The tools are built-in. You just plug and play, drag and drop, once you understand how to use the tools, it is easy."
"Automation is the most valuable aspect for us. The ability to wrap business logic around the data is very helpful."
"The solution has been stable."
"The most valuable feature of Alteryx is its stand-alone version that we do not have to download dependencies for loads. Additionally, the scan is useful for beginners."
"The solution has a very strong community that is involved in the product. It helps make the usage easier and helps us find answers to our questions."
"The most valuable feature of RapidMiner is that it is code free. It is similar to playing with Lego pieces and executing after you are finished to see the results. Additionally, it is easy to use and has interesting utilities when preparing the data. It has a utility to automatically launch a series of models and show the comparisons. When finished with the comparisons you can select the best one, and deploy it automatically."
"We value the collaboration and governance features because it's a comprehensive platform that covers everything from data extraction to modeling operations in the ML language. RapidMiner is competitive in the ML space."
"It is easy to use and has a huge community that I can rely on for help. Moreover, it is interactive."
"The best part of RapidMiner is efficiency."
"The documentation for this solution is very good, where each operator is explained with how to use it."
"It's helpful if you want to make informed decisions using data. We can take the information, tease out the attributes, and label everything. It's suitable for profiling and forecasting in any industry."
"The GUI capabilities of the solution are excellent. Their Auto ML model provides for even non-coder data scientists to deploy a model."
"I've been using a lot of components from the Strategic Extension and Python Extension."
"The technical support could have a little bit of improvement."
"I think sometimes the solution doesn't load properly or takes so much time for the workflows. Though the workflow runs and completes the file in Excel, if you use the same formula, it's a bit slow. Also, the image processing is not so good because I tried to do some image processing and they were like, sometimes they put two to eight. In the document, it was two, but the OCR predicted it as eight."
"They should work on its pricing."
"Even when it already includes some AI models, this area could be improved."
"We can't browse multiple files. When we deploy a solution on a gallery, let's say I have ten different files, and I have to upload them all at once. This is something that's difficult in the gallery. So case by case, I see some downsides, but often we do something alternative."
"More statistics tools: We can use to compare SPSS statistics with some automated advisory."
"It's a technical product and those that don't have proper training will have to deal with a steep learning curve."
"What they're struggling with is it's not as mature as Tableau in the user management area. It was tougher to manage the server part of it right away, especially since the user base has grown."
"I think that they should make deep learning models easier."
"If they could include video tutorials, people would find that quite helpful."
"Improve the online data services."
"RapidMiner would be improved with the inclusion of more machine learning algorithms for generating time-series forecasting models."
"In the Mexican or Latin American market, it's kind of pricey."
"I would like to see all users have access to all of the deep learning models, and that they can be used easily."
"The visual interface could use something like the-drag-and-drop features which other products already support. Some additional features can make RapidMiner a better tool and maybe more competitive."
"In terms of the UI and SaaS, the user interface with KNIME is more appealing than RapidMiner."
Alteryx is ranked 1st in Predictive Analytics with 74 reviews while RapidMiner is ranked 2nd in Predictive Analytics with 20 reviews. Alteryx is rated 8.4, while RapidMiner is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alteryx writes "Feature-rich ETL that condenses a number of functions into one tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RapidMiner writes "A no-code tool that helps to build machine learning models ". Alteryx is most compared with KNIME, Dataiku, Databricks, Tableau and Microsoft Power BI, whereas RapidMiner is most compared with KNIME, Dataiku, Tableau, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and IBM SPSS Modeler. See our Alteryx vs. RapidMiner report.
See our list of best Predictive Analytics vendors and best Data Science Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Predictive Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Of those three you should consider alteryx, it saves time in ETL a lot, Alteryx is better at handling large data sets tan Knime and RapidMiner. But please also consider Dataiku... Up to 3 users it's free ;o)