We compared Oracle Database and Amazon Aurora based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
In comparing Oracle Database to Amazon Aurora, Oracle Database is praised for its advanced analytics capabilities, seamless integration, and efficient data management, despite complex setup costs and higher pricing. On the other hand, Amazon Aurora is commended for its seamless scalability, excellent performance, and user-friendly interface, with varying feedback on pricing and setup. Both databases receive positive reviews for customer service and support, with suggestions for improvements in functionality and user experience.
Features: Oracle Database is known for its excellent performance, high scalability, advanced analytics capabilities, efficient data management, and seamless integration. In contrast, Amazon Aurora stands out for its seamless scalability, excellent performance, easy-to-use interface, and user-friendly management options.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Oracle Database is considered high, but justifiable due to its advanced features. Expert assistance is often required, making it complex and time-consuming. Amazon Aurora offers no upfront setup costs, making implementation easy. However, licensing terms for both products can vary and be challenging to navigate., Users have reported highly favorable ROI with Oracle Database, praising its ability to streamline operations, enhance security, improve data management, increase scalability, and boost productivity. Amazon Aurora also showed positive and valuable ROI.
Room for Improvement: Oracle Database could benefit from improvements in performance optimization, enhanced documentation and support resources, simplified installation processes, and more intuitive user interfaces. In contrast, Amazon Aurora needs enhancements in performance, scalability, backup and restoration processes, user interface, and pricing structure.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews comparing Oracle Database to Amazon Aurora indicate that the duration required for establishing a new tech solution can vary. Some users mentioned a longer timeframe for Oracle Database, with multiple phases involved, while the feedback for Amazon Aurora suggests varying durations for deployment and setup, depending on the context., Oracle Database's customer service is praised for its promptness and efficiency, as well as their knowledgeable and helpful support team. Users appreciate the clear and concise communication provided. On the other hand, Amazon Aurora's customer service has been positively received for its prompt and helpful assistance, efficient support staff, and positive user reviews.
The summary above is based on 31 interviews we conducted recently with Oracle Database and Amazon Aurora users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively."
"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."
"Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling."
"The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy."
"The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer."
"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."
"The solution is stable and has good performance."
"The solution is very easy to use in general."
"You can scale the solution without any issues."
"We find technical support to be very responsive. They briefly describe everything on phone and we handle the operations. I'd say we've been more than satisfied with their level of service. They're quite helpful and knowledgeable."
"It's extremely easy to use and the performance is great."
"The scalability is very good, and it is stable."
"RAC clustering allowed us to improve performance and provided additional redundancy."
"The autonomous database simplifies everything."
"I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."
"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."
"I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."
"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."
"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."
"There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired."
"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."
"The main thing we find could use improvement is the licensing costs. It is quite expensive relative to other database vendors. Cost always comes up as an issue for us as we consider upgrade paths. It's not as easy as we would like it to be."
"The consumption of memory and the client memory has been increased exorbitantly in the most recent past."
"The usage and security are okay for Oracle Database, but its pricing is more expensive when compared to its competitors."
"The licensing model is complicated and could be improved."
"In general, the support is not good since most of the time the person whom you are given to is not so professional."
"Its security is good, but it could be more secure."
"Security is an area that needs to be improved."
"Considering the current threats in the industry, my company has to put in efforts to update the tool, or we have to work on some more things so that we can have a secure environment."
Amazon Aurora is ranked 11th in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases Tools with 283 reviews. Amazon Aurora is rated 7.8, while Oracle Database is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon Aurora writes "Easy-to-manage platform with a valuable auto-scaling feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Supports a large volume of transactions compared to other databases". Amazon Aurora is most compared with SQL Server, MariaDB, CockroachDB, MySQL and SAP HANA, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, MariaDB, IBM Db2 Database and MySQL. See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle Database report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.