We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability of the solution is very good."
"The product's scalability is good."
"Amazon AWS has improved a lot on security and is very good. Additionally, You can integrate your own security into their AWS platform."
"It's highly scalable. It's guaranteed 99.99% uptime, and it shows you can scale up or scale out whenever you need more space."
"It is enough for us in terms of features. We don't have too many transactions, and it is sufficient for our current needs."
"The cutting-edge design is valuable."
"They provide cutting-edge features compared to other cloud vendors."
"The most valuable features are load balancers, databases, and S3 buckets."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"I am impressed with how the solution integrates with the ME system and ALE IDocs."
"It has significantly streamlined our operations."
"There's a minimum amount of downtime when using the solution. This platform is very effective."
"The BTP module is important for digital transformations."
"We have a wide range of use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud. These include production planning, materials management, sales management, treasury, finance, appliance maintenance, real estate, and warehouse management."
"Fiori is the most valuable feature, as well as the the integration between S/4 and another solution as an extension."
"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"The product would be better if it was more secure."
"AWS has room for improvement on the Kubernetes side. I would like to go a little deeper into the Kubernetes target, Elastic, inner system, and all that. The EKS, target, and all these areas need to be improved, but that is not my key area because I am mostly working on the application side."
"There should be seminars and online training sessions available from AWS because a lot of people who are not using it would benefit from having the basic knowledge or basic hands-on experience."
"I'm not an expert on the product, but if I had to suggest one improvement, I know a feature that would allow a person to backup his on-premise solution to the cloud directly with one click would be useful. This solution should be agnostic because sometimes a product that was backed up with Veeam is highly compatible with Commvault. I think it would be better if these backup features were agnostic. Viewing a build could also be improved. It's not easy to follow up on your consumption and see how much you're paying and how much you will be paying. Viewing the build could be more clear."
"It's sometimes a challenge to manage billing on this platform. It takes a lot of labor to generate billing for our customers from the service on the cloud."
"The pricing could be a bit high at times. It's something they could improve upon."
"The solution could offer better integration capabilities."
"I would like to see CloudFormation made more in the programming way of thinking."
"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."
"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."
"Customization is an area of concern in SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, where improvements are required."
"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."
"Perhaps minor changes to the enterprise structure could be made, but the rest is fine."
"The only thing that could be improved is the cost."
"The solution needs to embed or integrate with IBP to fully activate the PPT module with efficiency."
"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, Microsoft Azure, Red Hat OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP S4HANA on AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS. See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.