Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,303 views|1,885 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
72 views|70 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudWatch and Amazon OpenSearch Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution gives us very good real-time data.""I have found the memory metrics and the CPU metrics valuable.""We have found the pricing to be reasonable.""It's a very simple logging system.""I can put it in a simple term, its simplicity is always there.""The solution offers very detailed metrics for their services.""We can set CPU thresholds using the solution.""It offers direct integrations with various storage providers, making it convenient to push logs from CloudWatch to these external platforms."

More Amazon CloudWatch Pros →

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Pros →

Cons
"Right now, in relation to monitoring services, there are too many services and too many metrics per service.""For monitoring applications or for APM, CloudWatch has some limitations. You cannot monitor application performance from CloudWatch, and you have to go for a third-party tool.""When customers want to see the CPU or memory utilization there is a cost. This should be free to see the utilization.""What would make Amazon CloudWatch better is if it includes more on-site checks, particularly status checks on the CPU, network input/output, etc. It would also be helpful if there's built-in swap space, disk, and memory monitoring in Amazon CloudWatch because, at the moment, my team has to configure it manually through a shell script.""Better reporting is always something needed. That could be an answer to just about anything. But you always want better reporting, better dashboards, things that are just more dynamic and more accessible.""I do not know whether or not CloudWatch can be integrated with on-prem services.""I found several areas for improvement in Amazon CloudWatch. First is that it's tough to track issues and find out where it's going wrong. The process takes longer. For example, if I get an exception error, I read the logs, search, go to AWS Cloud, then to the groups to find the keyword to determine what's wrong. Another area for improvement in Amazon CloudWatch is that it's slow in terms of log streaming. It requires an entire twenty-four hours for scanning, rather than just one hour. This issue can be solved with Elasticsearch streaming with Kibana, but it requires a lot of development effort and integration with Kibana or Splunk, and this also means I need a separate developer and software technical stack to do the indexing and streaming to Kibana. It's a manual effort that you need to do properly, so log streaming should be improved in Amazon CloudWatch. The AWS support person should also have a better understanding of the logs in Amazon CloudWatch. What I'd like added to the solution is a more advanced search function, particularly one that can tell you more information or special information. Right now, the search function is difficult to use because it only gives you limited data. For example, I got an error message saying that the policy wasn't created. I only know the amount the customer paid for the policy, the mobile number, and the customer name, but if I use those details, the information won't show up on the logs. I need to enter more details, so that's the type of fuzzy matching Amazon CloudWatch won't provide. If this type of search functionality is provided, it will be very helpful for businesses and companies that provide professional services to customers, like ours.""CloudWatch doesn’t monitor disk throughput by default."

More Amazon CloudWatch Cons →

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have monthly licensing costs. The licenses are probably in the vicinity of about $300 - $350/month."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable. It is sometimes tricky, but it is reasonable as compared to others."
  • "What's were using is the free service of Amazon CloudWatch, so they're not charging us. As for hidden fees, we're not aware of them because we're using what our clients provided us."
  • "The pricing model is pay-as-you-go so you have to be mindful of usage to manage costs."
  • "Amazon CloudWatch has very cheap pricing, and it hardly costs my company $25-$30 a month for fifty systems, so it's pretty affordable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable for detailed basic monitoring."
  • "The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable. When the rate of data collection is done the price will increase. The price is less than other solutions."
  • More Amazon CloudWatch Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The monitoring features are valuable.
    Top Answer:CloudWatch doesn’t monitor disk throughput by default. It is part of EC2. If EC2 forwards the logs, then we can do it.
    Top Answer: We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage
    Top Answer:A managed service is more costly than a self-managed one. The cost isn't about monitoring; it also involves human resources and labor cost savings. For instance, if you previously used self-managed… more »
    Top Answer:Some configurations or settings are not accessible to end users, as OpenSearch Service is a managed service. It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    2,303
    Comparisons
    1,885
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    438
    Rating
    8.2
    46th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    70
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    882
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring and observability service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It allows users to collect and track metrics, collect and monitor log files, and set alarms. With CloudWatch, users can gain insights into their applications, infrastructure, and services, enabling them to make informed decisions and take necessary actions. 

    It provides a unified view of AWS resources and applications, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and optimize performance. CloudWatch offers a range of features including customizable dashboards, automated actions, and integration with other AWS services. 

    The product is a scalable and reliable solution that helps businesses ensure the availability and performance of their applications and infrastructure.

    Amazon OpenSearch Service securely unlocks real-time search, monitoring, and analysis of business and operational data for use cases like application monitoring, log analytics, observability, and website search.

    Sample Customers
    AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Log Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon CloudWatch is ranked 12th in Log Management with 40 reviews while Amazon OpenSearch Service is ranked 46th in Log Management with 1 review. Amazon CloudWatch is rated 8.0, while Amazon OpenSearch Service is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudWatch writes "Instantaneous response when monitoring logs and KPIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon OpenSearch Service writes "A managed solution that provides login authentication but has high cost". Amazon CloudWatch is most compared with Zabbix, Datadog, Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver), Dynatrace and Graylog, whereas Amazon OpenSearch Service is most compared with Grafana Loki, Datadog, Zabbix and Security Onion.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.