We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Komodor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We do not have to do a lot of administration, such as create virtual machines, or worry about our controllers or nodes going down because the solution is fully managed by Amazon."
"EKS has security features that you can't find in competing solutions."
"AWS cloud services are flexible and have thorough documentation. AWS also has data centers all over the world."
"The stability is excellent."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"Amazon EKS is like Kubernetes, but it helps manage our nodes and scalability in AWS."
"The solution's Autoscaler option allows for an increase in worker notes whenever particular thresholds are exceeded."
"It is the best service because it has proper security packages."
"The event timeline has been super helpful, enabling us to overlay node events in the same timeline as deployment events... That helps an engineer very quickly troubleshoot without having to do too much digging."
"Komodor's multi-cluster centralized event timeline is the most valuable feature."
"The more time we use Komodor the more we save. Currently, we have seen around a ten percent return on investment."
"The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."
"The service overview is definitely the most valuable feature. With it, I can see all the services and see if they're healthy or not without having to go specifically into each workflow individually. It has been immensely helpful for us whenever we've had network issues or other such issues. We've been able to use Komodor and see at a glance where there might be potential issues."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"I'd like to see the solution add a service catalog."
"It is very cumbersome to assign permissions to users to interact with a cluster."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"I'd like improved traffic handling and additional application details within the system."
"Amazon EKS provides very minimum information during the upgrade of the node group."
"The management of the nodes in Amazon EKS should be improved."
"I would like to see the user interface improved because it is hard to find and not straightforward."
"I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."
"I would like to see improvements in how the product is installed. We've already communicated these things directly to Komodor. One feature we would like to see is for Komodor to be highly available on the clusters. Currently, it's only able to run in one instance within the cluster."
"One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."
"I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."
"Komodor's visibility could be improved."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 39 reviews while Komodor is ranked 12th in Container Management with 5 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Komodor is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Komodor writes "Provides extensive visibility into our nodes and has been incredibly useful in freeing up our DevOps staff for other projects". Amazon EKS is most compared with Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes and Linode, whereas Komodor is most compared with Portainer and Rancher Labs. See our Amazon EKS vs. Komodor report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.