We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"like its performance and the stability. It's very stable and, performance-wise, it's really great."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"I like the schemaless architecture that it follows. I also like the sharding that it provides."
"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."
"I value the API integrations."
"We've found the product to be scalable."
"I like that MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle."
"MongoDB has a simple data-loading interface."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"Lacks sufficient scalability and elasticity."
"We'd like information about client onboarding experience and success stories. It would help to have something to show to internal stakeholders."
"I'd like to see an ID generator. It's very technical but I don't think it has one, so we have to go to great lengths to work around that."
"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."
"The user interface is not as friendly as Oracle, which is something that can be improved."
"MongoDB should better support small and medium companies. There are a lot of clients out there that are interested, however, they need something lighter and less complex and something not so expensive upfront."
"The performance can be improved."
"Data encryption is possible using third-party tools but they should have their own encryption capability built-in to this solution."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". Amazon QLDB is most compared with , whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.