We performed a comparison between Apigee and Axway AMPLIFY API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The security that you have with Apigee is very good and aligns with compliance."
"Apigee gives you plenty of opportunities to set up your workspace depending on how you want to manage your APIs."
"The developer portal is very useful to customers."
"Apigee makes proxy management very simple."
"We can customize the dashboard."
"Apigee is an easy-to-use solution."
"The most valuable feature is monetization."
"There are just a lot of security features in general."
"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."
"We like the portal for documentation a lot."
"The administration tool for this solution is good."
"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."
"This platform can be highly scalable."
"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."
"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."
"When it comes to the rate limit, we don't have a specific category for rate limits for a particular customer."
"I see some lagging in regards to integration capacity"
"The solution’s scalability could be improved."
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"It needs predictive analysis of consumption."
"The developer portal's adoption of the OpenAPI standard needs to be improved. In the latest version of the developer portal, they have adopted the OpenAPI standard. This feature, however, can be improved by supporting more characteristics of the OpenAPI standard."
"We are experiencing issues with automation; the production in Apigee is quite time-consuming."
"Apigee could do more to make users aware of what is available in the add-ons."
"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."
"The installation process is a bit complex and it could be a lot simpler."
"The portal still has room for improvement."
"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."
"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."
"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."
"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."
"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while Axway AMPLIFY API Management is ranked 15th in API Management with 12 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while Axway AMPLIFY API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY API Management writes "An API management solution for ESB and B2B integration between systems with security". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager, Amazon API Gateway and Apache APISIX, whereas Axway AMPLIFY API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, Kong Gateway Enterprise, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Layer7 API Management. See our Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.