We performed a comparison between Apigee and Postman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are just a lot of security features in general."
"The analytics feature is quite good."
"The security provided by the solution is excellent."
"Apigee makes proxy management very simple."
"The initial setup isn't too complex."
"The developer portal is very useful to customers."
"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."
"The pricing is okay."
"The solution has a great user interface and collection of features."
"The API testing features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is that JavaScript can be included as tests."
"Postman helps to write pre-request scripts and make a collection out of each request. You don’t have to spend time writing or copying the requests. The solution lets you integrate multiple environments and their features. Either the tool’s pro or premium version lets you do the merge and pull request for the Git directly."
"Postman uses the DRY framework of JavaScript and that framework is easy and a good way to put assertions on responses."
"The variables part is good. We can easily define the variables and we don't have to manually do a change every time, it gets automatically updated."
"The tool is simple and easy."
"We can test APIs. We know if they are functional or throwing any errors."
"I have heard there maybe be some security issues that need to be addressed. If this is the situation I would encourage taking a look at the security matters."
"Better functionality for validating inputs and outputs would be helpful."
"I see some lagging in regards to integration capacity"
"What my clients don't like is that the on-premises solution is not being treated and maintained as well as the cloud solution."
"I would like to see better integration and some architectural improvements in future releases of the solution."
"Apigee is not a solution compatible with public clouds, making it one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."
"Drag and drop of features would be more beneficial, rather than manually working on the configuration and updates."
"There needs to be more flexibility surrounding the testing of SOAP APIs."
"I have display issues in my Windows that need to be fixed."
"If there is any way to have a record and playback feature through UI, as we do in Selenium and IDEs such as Eclipse, it would be great."
"The solution has some user interface difficulties when conducting environment collections."
"The solution can be improved by providing detailed error logs including the line the error took place to make it easier to correct."
"We cannot see transaction times in the product."
"If they could implement auto-validations and assertions from SoapUI, that would be a very good feature."
"Multi-part requests should be handled in the octet-stream."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while Postman is ranked 9th in API Management with 52 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while Postman is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Postman writes "Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager, Amazon API Gateway and 3scale API Management, whereas Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and Parasoft SOAtest. See our Apigee vs. Postman report.
See our list of best API Management vendors and best API Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.