We performed a comparison between Appian and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."
"Appian is easy to install and set up, and it does not come out with your audit. It has accessible process orchestration and process management. With Appian, the time to market is much faster."
"The tech support is quite good."
"There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored."
"It has created executable requirements and speeds up the SDLC process greatly."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"The solution could improve by being more responsive when dealing with large quantities of data. Additionally, they can make the decision or rules engine better. It cannot handle too many rules or too many decisions at once."
"We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."
"Something I would like to see improved is an SQL database connection."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Appian is ranked 6th in Rapid Application Development Software with 58 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Appian is rated 8.4, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, whereas Unqork is most compared with Pega BPM, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.