We performed a comparison between Aqua Security Platform and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Aqua Security Platform is appreciated for its container security and malware detection capabilities. SUSE NeuVector has been praised for its comprehensive feature set, informative dashboard, and impressive performance. Aqua Security Platform could improve its automated reporting and log forwarding while decreasing resource consumption and making integration more seamless. SUSE NeuVector could add support for IaaS and virtual machine scanning, enhance integration with other security tools in hybrid environments, and raise visibility into the DevSecOps pipeline.
Service and Support: Aqua Security Platform's customer service is generally considered prompt and supportive. However, a few users have mentioned having to resolve problems on their own. SUSE NeuVector's support is known for being knowledgeable and helpful, but some users find the process challenging to navigate.
Ease of Deployment: Aqua Security Platform users reported that the complexity, difficulty, and time needed to set up the platform can vary depending on the user's experience and environment. SUSE NeuVector's setup is considered to be moderately difficult.
Pricing: The cost of Aqua Security Platform falls within the average range. It's less expensive than some alternatives, but others noted that it isn't cheap. Some SUSE NeuVector users consider it inexpensive, but others say there is room for improvement.
ROI: Aqua Security Platform delivers value by offering accurate and up-to-date information. SUSE NeuVector is particularly advantageous for high-risk industries such as financial services.
Comparison Results: Aqua Security Platform outperforms SUSE NeuVector in several aspects. Users appreciate Aqua Security Platform for its ease of setup, extensive range of features, on-demand patching, and excellent customer service. SUSE NeuVector has been criticized for its complex setup process and reliance on custom scripts for integration. Users reported problems with inadequate documentation and limited integration options.
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to gain deep visibility into the workloads inside containers."
"As a frequently audited company, we value PingSafe's compliance monitoring features. They give us a report with a compliance score for how well we meet certain regulatory standards, like HIPAA. We can show our compliance as a percentage. It's also a way to show that we are serious about security."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The most valuable features of PingSafe are the asset inventory and issue indexing."
"Cloud Native Security offers attack path analysis."
"The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue."
"The ease of use of the platform is very nice."
"We use Aqua Security for the container security features."
"From what I understand, the initial setup is simple."
"The container security element of this product has been very valuable to our organization."
"Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment."
"The most helpful feature of Aqua Security is Drift Prevention, which is a feature that allows images to be immutable. In addition, one of the main reasons we went with Aqua Security is because it provides strong protection when it comes to runtime security."
"Aqua Security allowed us to gain visibility into the vulnerabilities that were present in the container images, that were being rolled out, the amount of risk that we were introducing to the platform, and provided us a look into the container environment by introducing access control mechanisms. In addition, when it came to runtime-level policies, we could restrict container access to resources in our environment, such as network-level or other application-level access."
"Their sandboxing service is also really good."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and manage."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"When you find a vulnerability and resolve it, the same issue will not occur again. I want PingSafe to block the same vulnerability from appearing again. I want something like a playbook where the steps that we take to resolve an issue are repeated when that issue happens again."
"The Automation tab is an add-on that doesn’t work properly. They provide a list of scripts that don’t work and I have asked support to assist but they won’t help. When running on various endpoints the script doesn’t work and if it does, it’s only a couple. There are a lot of useful scripts that would be beneficial to run forensics, event logs, and process lists running on the endpoint."
"They need more experienced support personnel."
"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."
"There is no break-glass account feature. They should implement this as soon as possible because we can't implement SSO without a break-glass feature."
"I would like PingSafe's detections to be openly available online instead of only accessible through their portal. Other tools have detections that are openly available without going through the tool."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"In the next release, Aqua Security should add the ability to automatically send reports to customers."
"Aqua Security lacks a lot in reporting."
"We would like to see an improvement in the overview visibility that this solution offers."
"They want to release improvements to their product to work with other servers because now there are more focused on the Kubernetes environment. They need to improve the normal servers. I would like to have more options."
"Since we are working from home, we would like to have the proper training for Aqua."
"The user interface could be improved, especially in terms of organization and clarity."
"The integrations on CICD could be improved. If Aqua had more plugins or container images to integrate and automate more easily on CICD, it would be better."
"I would like Aqua Security to look into is the development of a web security portal."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aqua Cloud Security Platform is ranked 7th in Container Security with 16 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is rated 8.0, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Aqua Cloud Security Platform writes "Reliable with good container scanning and a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Aqua Cloud Security Platform is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Snyk, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and Sysdig Secure, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Sysdig Falco, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Sysdig Secure and Snyk. See our Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.