We performed a comparison between ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The tool's architecture is thin and scalable. We also like the product's ease of deployment. My company is also impressed with the solution's number of connectors."
"The automatic rotation of credentials is probably the most useful feature."
"CyberArk PAM can be easily automated."
"Their legacy of more than 20 years is very valuable. It brings a lot of stability to the product and a wide variety of integration with the ecosystem. Because of these factors, it has also been very successful in deployment. So, the legacy and integration with other technologies make the PAM platform very stable and strong. In terms of features, most of the other vendors are still focusing just on the privileged access management or session recording, but CyberArk has incorporated artificial intelligence to make PAM a more proactive system. They have implemented threat analytics into this, and there is also a lot of focus on domain controller production, Windows Server protection, and stuff like that. They have also further advanced it with the security on the cloud and DevOps systems. They have a bundle licensing model, which really helps. They don't have a complex licensing model. Even though in our market, people say CyberArk is expensive as compared to some of the other products, but in terms of overall value and as a bundling solution, it is an affordable and highly scalable product."
"It has helped from an auditing perspective identify who has access to privileged accounts."
"The password management feature is valuable."
"CyberArk is not just an IT security or cybersecurity tool. It's also an administrator tool. I had a fair number of systems where the passwords were not fully managed by CyberArk yet, and they were expiring every 30 or 45 days. I was able to get management turned on for those accounts. From an administrator perspective, I didn't have to go back into those systems and manually change those passwords anymore. CyberArk... lightened the load on our administrative work."
"You can gradually implement CyberArk, starting with more easily attainable goals."
"Helped us meet our standards and requirements to help us comply with industry standards and banking regulations."
"The tool needs to improve its pricing."
"The interface on version 9 looks old."
"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time."
"The initial setup was somewhat complex."
"I'm not a fan of technical support with CyberArk. It's like jumping through red tape and hoops. Quite frankly, it's almost like when you call CyberArk you get the Help Desk or the level-one. I'm a level-one. I got the CCD, I know how to do the initial troubleshooting. When I call CyberArk it's because I can't figure the problem out. So I need a level-two, three, four. I don't need you to tell me, "Hey, open a ticket and then give me logs.""
"We would like to expand the usage of the auto discovery accounts feed, then on our end, tie in the REST API for automation."
"I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution."
"The Vault's disaster recovery features need improvement."
"The solution could improve by adding more connectors."
More ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is ranked 15th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews. ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is rated 10.0, while CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS writes "Helps to manage human, digital and machine identities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". ARCON Privileged Access Management SaaS is most compared with , whereas CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.