We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's strong security mechanism and user-friendly web console are great."
"It integrates with the Aruba portfolio very easily, and it's a vendor-agnostic solution, and that's brilliant."
"Aruba makes use of "Direct Tunnel" as its best security feature."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is that it is easy to configure. Additionally, with the same configuration with Cisco and Ruckus, we can receive 55 to 60 percent more out of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"All the features are available, even including the security. The access point enables the matching of any connectivity."
"The solution is easy to use."
"What I like most about Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is seamless integration from an endpoint perspective. Another valuable feature of the product is that it supports certificate-based authentication."
"Having dual-band is important. Having compatibility with very old equipment on certain frequencies, for example on 2.4 and 5.8."
"I would say that the user experience is pretty good in this solution as well as the roaming solution part of it."
"One of the nice features is the backup version control."
"The failure rate is very low on these devices - I've had them installed for five years and have only lost one out of a hundred."
"The 3x3 MIMO antenna provides excellent coverage and the product is well supported by Ubiquiti in terms of firmware updates."
"I have found the most valuable features to be how user-friendly it is and how simple it is to do the configurations."
"The solution has an easy configuration."
"Overall, it's a straightforward solution."
"The customization options could be improved."
"The solution would be improved with a better interface."
"The product offers a feature that pinpoints where the devices are to help users find them easily if they want to know where a laptop or tablet is, but it is a feature that needs improvements due to some shortcomings."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is expensive."
"In a meshed environment, the handoff between access points is sometimes not smooth when users are mobile. For example, a connection is occasionally interrupted when a user takes their laptop from the gym to the cafeteria."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"The integration, pricing, and configuration could always be improved upon."
"Their stock is a bit low compared to others, making it difficult to purchase."
"My company has to wait for a response from the product's support team. From an improvement perspective, the product's support team should be quicker to respond."
"This product has issues with scalability and ease of manageability at scale. Security also needs to be improved, when compared to its competitors. Ubiquiti Wireless doesn't have any support that you can call. They only have an online portal where you can access support documentation, but it's not great. You have to figure out issues and solutions for yourself."
"The documentation and support provided by the solution areas of concern where improvements are required."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve by being more user-friendly and easy to use."
"In Ukraine at least, it's a problem when it comes to buying the hardware. For example, I made a request for 20 switches a few months ago. The solution needs to have worldwide availability."
"The technical support services need improvement."
"The product lacks to offer reliability to users."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.