We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Drupal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers a lot of freedom when drafting directly online."
"The initial setup is very easy."
"The best feature is the automatic tagging of information in documents. The automatic algorithm highlights irrelevant information that conflict with the actual documents."
"The ease of use has been one of the most valuable features. It has a very simple wiki."
"We have found limiting permissions and history very valuable."
"Great shareable and co-editing features."
"The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"Many people enjoy its zero learning-curve."
"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"It is good for big projects."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve how information is shared outside our company. We had some negative experiences with the rights we have with our information when sharing it within Atlassian Confluence and with other teams outside the company. It's due to the limitations on the rights we have on the export capabilities. We don't have sufficient rights to do so."
"The user interface is a little bit stale. The file attachments and how they work could be improved. There is also room for improvement when it comes to CDNs."
"Atlassian needs to provide the source editor or a built-in plugin."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"I have a couple of different pipelines that I work with. However, I'd like to see them displayed differently on the same dashboard. So, I would like to have a unified dashboard to view the different pipelines."
"The flexibility and simplicity of this solution could be improved. We would also like the ability to add plugins."
"The standard table capability is substandard and virtually unusable."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
Earn 20 points
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while Drupal is ranked 4th in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals). Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Drupal is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Freshdesk, whereas Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Liferay Digital Experience Platform, Adobe Experience Manager and Squiz Digital Experience Platform. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Drupal report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.